<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://regexadvice.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Michael Ash's Regex Blog : PCRE</title><link>http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/archive/tags/PCRE/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: PCRE</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>Validating Email Revisited </title><link>http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/archive/2008/09/28/Validating-Email-Revisited-.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d291b357-6366-4006-9008-4266c301325a:46728</guid><dc:creator>mash</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/comments/46728.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/commentrss.aspx?PostID=46728</wfw:commentRss><description>First off let me say I&amp;#39;m a bit over my head here. Not regex part but host the language of the regex engine. Many moons ago I posted a blog article stating why you could not write a regex that validated an e-mail address 100% . Well this is still true,...(&lt;a href="http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/archive/2008/09/28/Validating-Email-Revisited-.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://regexadvice.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=46728" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/archive/tags/Email/default.aspx">Email</category><category domain="http://regexadvice.com/blogs/mash/archive/tags/PCRE/default.aspx">PCRE</category></item></channel></rss>